The motivation behind the promise has no impact on the conclusion. Since the Foundation's conclusion is that the weapons research will not benefit from their money, you're looking for something that weakens that conclusion. With (A) the suggestion that the Foundation's money would free up existing funds for weapon's research, weakening the conclusion that the weapons research would not benefit from the Foundation's money. The motivation behind the university's promise has no bearing on the conclusion at all. In fact, it's unlikely that the university would make such a promise for any reason other than to induce the Foundation to withdraw its threat, but that doesn't matter to the argument.
