The United States government generally tries to protect valuable natural resources. But one resource has been ignored...
ekaterinaurban@gmail.comJune 8, 2018
The main point the choice E are not the same
You are saying that the main point is "But one resource (topsoil) has been ignored for too long" Then you offer as a correct choice :" The federal government should spend much more on soil conservation than it has been spending".
It doesn't sound it is logical because the choice E is more like a suggestion how to fix the situation/problem but not the conclusion. The right choice should just rephrase the main point of the stimulus, something like : " The government hasn't been spending much on soil conservation” Or am I missing something here?
Replies
Create a free account to read and
take part in forum discussions.
I'm not sure what your question is. Can you please explain?
ekaterinaurban@gmail.comJune 20, 2018
Again, why is the conclusion suggesting how to fix the problem? Per my understanding the conclusion is a rephrasing the main point?
AnitaJune 21, 2018
@ekaterinaurban@gmail.com The prompt is telling us that US national investments in top soil have been inadequate, meaning that they should be higher. This is what E tells us, that the spending should be higher.
