Environmentalists who seek stricter governmental regulations controlling water pollution should be certain to have th...
Samantha-AlexisMay 22, 2019
Answer B
Answer choice B is correct because the elementary school kids are judging multiplication tables, and not if math itself should be included in the curriculum, right? And say if answer choice B instead involved the kids judging wether or not math should be included in the curriculum, it then would conform to the principle?
Reply
Create a free account to read and
take part in forum discussions.
Great question. I'm not sure what you're referring to regarding your math example, as that isn't present in this question. Is this not the right question for your inquiry? If it's not, let us know. In the meantime, let's take a look at (B) and why it's wrong.
(B) says, "Politicians who defend the rights of unpopular constituencies ought to see to it that they use cool, dispassionate rhetoric in their appeals. Even if they have their facts straight, inflammatory rhetoric can cause a backlash that results in more negative reactions to these constituencies, whether or not they are deserving of more rights."
The problem with (B) is that it doesn't say anything about getting their facts straight or losing credibility. All it describes is the best rhetoric to use, and this doesn't match the principle illustrated in the stimulus.
Does that make sense? Let us know if you have any other questions!
