Confused on why some is utilized when A is in both properties
A > B
Shouldn't the premise be
Not B > Not A
I get that atleast one A exist but it doesn't exclude BOTH A from existing
Plus all the other answers are equal to each other so by process of elimination
B > C
Not C > not B > not A??
I know I'm wrong, just confused
Reply
Create a free account to read and
take part in forum discussions.
