By referring to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as "purely programmatic" (line 49) in nature, the author mo...

The cause and effect explanation spelled out here doesn't appear to be the main relationship we should be focusing on? The cause usually has the conclusion . The conclusion is that the ban is not only unnecessary but dangerous that wouldnt otherwise exist so shouldnt that be the cause and the effect is the deer invading, damaging, motor accidents. Please explain why this relationship is not the one we should be addressing - isn't the one that includes the conlcusion? the cause being a ban on hunting is not the conclusion thanks