Sickles found at one archaeological site had scratched blades, but those found at a second site did not. Since sickl...

RS1 September 7, 2020

Explain

Is B correct because the explanation uses the sickle found at the first and second site and grains?

Create a free account to read and take part in forum discussions.

Already have an account? log in

Emil-Kunkin March 20, 2024

B is correct because the author uses the sickle scratches to indicate the presence of grain. If something else could have caused the scratches, then the sickle scratches no longer necessarily indicate the presence of grain.