Strengthen with Sufficient Premise Questions - - Question 24

In the past decade, a decreasing percentage of money spent on treating disease X went to pay for standard methods of ...

Sash September 29, 2020

Why not D

I am still confused as to how D isn’t correct because by spending money on the nonstandard which is cheaper & ineffective you would think that it makes the argument sufficient because they are going the cheaper route when when they should be budgeting instead for the standard method. So with every purchase of the nonstandard is less money spent that should be actually spent for the standard treatment.

Replies
Create a free account to read and take part in forum discussions.

Already have an account? log in

Ravi October 1, 2020

@Sash, great question. (D) is incorrect because it does not rule out the possibility that spending on standard treatments went up. If there were a huge increase in spending on all treatments for disease X, but just slightly more for nonstandard treatments, then the conclusion could be false. Thus, (D) is out.

Sash October 2, 2020

Got it. Thank you!