Daily Drills 2 - Section 2 - Question 4
Supply the missing premise that makes the conclusion follow logically:P: A → not BP: ?C: B → C
Replies
JalaneG January 21, 2021
Same thing here!
moprice1991 February 22, 2021
I figured it out. you cant just reverse or just negate.Jilla October 20, 2022
Same, I don't see it. Can you write it out moprice?
Emil-Kunkin October 24, 2022
These are not equal signs, this is conditional logic. We are not saying that A and B are the exact same, we are saying that if A happens, B must also happenLucy April 20, 2023
Think about it like cat = not dog vs not dog = cat! Just because something isn't a dog, doesn't necessarily mean it's a cat.Kiana June 3, 2023
I'm concerned are these type of questions actually on the lsat?!!?
Emil-Kunkin June 4, 2023
They are not, these are drill to help you with conditional logic. That said, there are some question types that will test the same skills, just with a more fleshed out passage than this.