Principle: Only if a professor believes a student knowingly presented someone else's ideas without attribution should...
Anthony-ResendesJanuary 21, 2021
Confused
The explanation for answer choice being incorrect is, the principle doesn't discuss evidence. How can this be so when the first sentence says the professor doesn't have compelling evidence. This isn't a belief as the answer choice says, rather it explicitly discusses the evidence the professor does not have not his personal beliefs. Please explain.
Replies
Create a free account to read and
take part in forum discussions.
Ok I see, I misunderstood, the explanation was speaking on the principle in the stimulus as the principle never discusses evidence rather the professor belief.
shunheJanuary 30, 2021
Glad you figured it out! Let us know if you have any further questions.
