Thanks for the question! So that sentence seems more like a premise supporting the actual conclusion. That sentence basically says “if the toys had safety info, parents could prevent the injuries.” And then we have another sentence that says “the toys should have safety labels.” Doesn’t it seem more natural to say the first sentence supports the second? Because it does, the first is the premise, the second the conclusion.
Hope this helps! Feel free to ask any other questions that you might have.
