I was reading through some of the questions and responses regarding the difference between examples 1 and 2 in the valid arguments section, and wanted some clarification. If it is true that we should consider only what is on LSAT (or the material in question), how do we know to question the premise? I can understand weakening the argument, and how it can be weakened. I suppose this question has to do with my approach to the question/passage at task. Should we be ready to question/weaken a premise with common knowledge base on this distinction?
Replies
Create a free account to read and
take part in forum discussions.