A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive, taking secon...

Jack-Passero July 13, 2022

Diagramming Conditions

For this question, I was somewhat lost when I had not assumed any of the answers, and I think it may be an error in my diagramming. I was wondering if there was a visual explanation on how to diagram a question like this? I had it as follows: I & FPU --> not O contrapositive: O --> not I or not FPU MA --> not FPU contrapositive: FPU --> not MA Based on these conditionals, I was unable to conclude anything, as they are separate conditions. I assume this means I either left something out, or I did not interpret the conditionals correctly; however, I am confused on which one of those it is.

Create a free account to read and take part in forum discussions.

Already have an account? log in

Emil-Kunkin July 16, 2022

Hi Jack,

We know that

If I/F ->U
if Not U -> Not I/F

We are also told that "modern architects violate this precept. I think that, by violating the above precept, we can conclude that modern architects make obtrusive buildings. Your diagram is correct, but this is a question where diagraming alone may not lead you to the correct answer.