Argument Structure Questions - - Question 28

People's political behavior frequently does not match their rhetoric. Although many complain about government interv...

brian.eugene.smith@gmail.com August 16, 2022

Main/Intermediate Conclusion

Hello, I am struggling to understand the conclusion/intermediate conclusion. I did the 'therefore' and 'because' tests. The ‘therefore’ test makes more sense when putting the first sentence as the intermediate conclusion and the last sentence as main conclusion, but the ‘because’ test makes more sense with the first sentence as the main conclusion and the last as the intermediate. Did I miss apply these two tests? If not, how can I look at this differently to arrive at the correct answer? ‘Therefore’ Test – they both could work, but I think 1 makes more sense. 1) People’s political behavior frequently does not match their rhetoric, therefore voters often reelect politicians whose behavior they resent. 2) Voters often reelect politicians whose behavior they resent, therefore people’s behavior frequently does not match their rhetoric. ‘Because’ Test – again they both could work, but I think 1 makes more sense. 1) People’s political behavior frequently does not match their rhetoric, because voters often reelect politicians whose behavior they resent. 2) Voters often reelect politicians whose behavior they resent, because people’s behavior frequently does not match their rhetoric. Any advice or clarification is appreciated.

Replies
Create a free account to read and take part in forum discussions.

Already have an account? log in

Rene July 26, 2023

I am also sharing the same question, quite literally word for word, as Brian is here. What would I do? I believe the main conclusion is that People's political behavior frequently does not match their rhetoric, but I would like more clarity on how to be definitively sure of this.

Emil-Kunkin July 30, 2023

I agree with your take on the because test, the first iteration makes much more sense. But I disagree about the therefore test. The idea that people elect reps they resent supports the idea that peoples actions don't match their rhetoric. One is a concrete example of a behavior, and the other is a general principle. The concrete example is evidence for the general principle.