June 2020 LSAT Section 1 Question 10

Suppose the condition that Nasser or Taneguchi is interviewed last is replaced with the condition that neither Nasser...

Chuck on September 19, 2022

Not really sure how this combination is possible

The prompt states that if N & T are together then N is immediately before T. In this case, G would be at 1 making L in 3 leaving no room for N to be immediately before T. O and I can't be in there because R is in last place leaving the remainder to fill the interview schedule being G,N,T,L, and R. How would T be in 4th place?

Replies

Create a free account to read and take part in forum discussions.

Already have an account? log in

supreet1 on October 11, 2022

Why is A incorrect ?

Emil-Kunkin on December 26, 2022

Hi, A is wrong because I think both of them could be not interviewed.

For D, let's see what happens if T is 4.

_ _ _ T _ OUT:

We could put G in first

G _ _ T _ OUT:

We could put O last, and take R out

G _ _ T O OUT: R

And then out LN in 2 and 3.