Home LSAT Prep LSAT Community
Argument Structure Questions - - Question 24

Seemingly inconsequential changes in sea temperature due to global warming eventually result in declines in fish and ...

burdal December 27, 2022

Why C and not E?

C mentions "large" animals which are not mentioned. The given explanation for E talks about how it is too extreme, but the stimulus covers significant ground with the animals it lists. Would it be possible to get a more thorough explanation than was offered in the given explanation for C?

Reply
Create a free account to read and take part in forum discussions.

Already have an account? log in

Emil-Kunkin December 30, 2022

Hi, the passage is only about fish and seabirds, not all animals. This is talking about the marine food chain, and does not extend to all animals. C doesn't talk about large animals, but about ones larger than plankton, such as seabirds and fish, which is what the argument is about.