P: All leprechauns are shoemakers.P: No leprechauns are females.C: ?

So for this question, is the correct answer a or e. the presumed logic of e relies on there not being any leprechauns that exist, however, if that is true that opens up you requiring knowledge of what exist and what does not exist. we would have to throw out the logic of we assume a premise to be absolutely true, unless otherwise specified by the premises. if the lsat says all dogs walk on two legs, are we supposed to take away, "ah but this is impossible" therefore you are wrong! (probably why lsat refers to real world situations) similarly a stimuli can have a false conclusion drawn from the premises, it is no different than if the lsat asks us to perform flawed parallel reasoning. sure a necessary assumption here is that leprechauns exist. if asked to weaken then you could say leprechauns dont exist. but weaken as a question type requires by nature to go beyond the stimulus. I think it is extremely confusing for the answer to be represented beyond pure logic especially since the lsat will say "if the above is true, if the above is correct." even if this is correct is true that i should generally operate with the assumption that two all statements can have a some inference if the sufficient terms are the same. all dogs in this competition are black, all dogs have four legs, some black dogs have four legs.