Only an expert in some branch of psychology could understand why Patrick is behaving irrationally. But no expert is c...
hassay18February 22, 2024
Premise #2 of this question
How does "Pr 2: But no expert is certain to be able to solve someone else's problem." conclude that this premise tells us that if someone is able to solve someone else's problem, he is no psychology expert. The premise just means that no expert is - with 100% certainty - able to so solve someone else's problem.
Replies
Create a free account to read and
take part in forum discussions.
The premise does not tell us that if someone is able to solve someone else's problem then the solver is not an expert. Where do you see that? Your interpretation in the last sentence is correct.
gabriellaportelliJanuary 13 at 03:56PM
Isn't the statement - "But no expert is certain to be able to solve someone else's problem" a sufficient condition? Why can this statement also be reversed and negated? I assumed it could not be reversed & negated but the solution suggests we must reverse & negate.
