Two paleontologists, Dr. Tyson and Dr. Rees, disagree over the interpretation of certain footprints that were left am...
mjhirschAugust 25, 2015
Why not (c)?
Could you please explain why answer choice C is not correct? To me, it sounds like it provides a parallel situation where there is no cross stepping; an example of what it would really look like if the footprints were human, and therefore, we can conclude that the footprints at site G are not human.
Reply
Create a free account to read and
take part in forum discussions.
You are assuming that answer choice (C) says that these prints at site M are from a human. But it only states that they are shaped like a human's, as are the ones in site G. Therefore, it does not create an example of what human prints would look like since these human-like prints at site M could just be some animals with similar feet to a human. Therefore, having human-like non-cross-stepping prints at a site we are not discussing makes no difference to our argument.
Hope that clears things up! Please let us know if you have any other questions.
