The self-interest here is the government's self-interest in adopting a policy of free speech, i.e. "when ideas are openly aired, good ideas flourish, silly proposals are easily recognized as such, and dangerous ideas can be responded to by rational argument."
Hope this helps! Please let us know if you have any other questions.
BatmanDecember 1, 2013
Wow, I thought "self interest" is pertaining to policy advisor. Hmm...
ZhenzhenNovember 29, 2020
That is what I thought too....
SMAMay 19, 2022
I also had a hard time understanding the "self-interest" part. That is the reason I did not choose that answer.
Emil-KunkinMay 24, 2022
Hi SMA,
(C) is pretty high-level, and hard to immediately parse. Let's describe why the analyst thinks that free speech is good. They say that it is a basic human right- and then proceeds into the argument that it is the only rational policy because free speech enables the best ideas to come to the fore, while silly or dangerous ideas are marginalized.
It seems like we have two reasons why free speech is good- it is a human right, and it leads to the best outcomes.
This is actually a pretty good match for (C), human rights certainly are a moral idea, and we can assume it is in the self interest of a government for good ideas to win out over silly or dangerous ones.
Self interest in general could refer to the self interest of the speaker (the analyst), or of the subject (the governments), but from the context it seems clear that the analyst was appealing to the self-interest of governments.
