Quantifiers Questions - - Question 14

No projects that involve historical restorations were granted building permits this month. Since some of the current ...

Montero December 29, 2013

Video

Needs a video explanation please

Replies
Create a free account to read and take part in forum discussions.

Already have an account? log in

Naz January 3, 2014

Let's diagram the argument:

"No projects that involve historical restorations were granted building permits this month."

P1: IHR ==> not GBP
GBP ==> not IHR

"Since some of the current projects of the firm of Stein and Sapin are historical restorations,"

P2: SS-some-IHR
IHR-some-SS

"at least some of Stein and Sapin's projects were not granted building permits this month."

C: SS-some-not GBP
not GBP-some-SS

Remember that when you want to combine a quantity statement with a Sufficient & Necessary statement, you have to arrange the premises so that the sufficient condition of the Sufficient & Necessary statement and the right-hand side variable of the quantity statement are the same, like so: SS-some-IHR ==> not GBP

We can then conclude: SS-some-not GBP. Therefore, this is a valid argument.

Now, let's diagram answer choice (D):

"Several films directed by Hannah Barker were released this season,"

P1: HB-some-RTS
RTS-some-HB

"but none of the films released this season were enthusiastically reviewed."

P2: RTS ==> not ER
ER ==> not RTS

"Therefore, at least some of Hannah Barker's films have not received enthusiastic reviews."

C: HB-some-not ER

We can arrange like so: HB-some-RTS ==> not ER.

Thus, we can conclude: HB-some-not ER.

So answer choice (D) has the same exact reasoning that we encountered in the argument.

Hope that helped! Please let us know if you have any other questions.

yababio May 21, 2015

Theres no video

Naz May 21, 2015

There is no need for a video explanation to this question since it has no major visual components. Please refer to the written explanation above for a breakdown of the problem.

Hope that helps! Please let us know if you have any other questions.

doglvr August 12, 2015

Does several indicate some or most?

doglvr August 12, 2015

On a general basis?

*sorry forgot to add this before

Naz August 19, 2015

Great question! "Several" indicates "some."

Hope that helps!

ariella February 21, 2017

Why isn't the answer B?

surene April 17, 2018

Can you diagram the other answer choices please

Alexx637 May 24, 2018

Can you diagram D? Definitely should do a video.

Alexx637 May 24, 2018

Never mind, I see the diagram

KimJongUn September 26, 2018

Answer choice C raised a question for me. It starts with "Only" and later says "People who." How do we know which term over powers the other.

Anita September 27, 2018

@KimJongUn I'm not sure I'm following your question here, so please let me know if I don't answer it to your needs. Both are important, and in this case work together. "Only [those] people who" is a regular LSAT way of specifying a specific group of people that have certain characteristics distinct from others. In C, it means that there's a rule that only people who completed their paperwork can be paid. We know that no new members did their paperwork, so they are not getting paid.