LSATMax and COVID-19:
Amid these difficult times, we're lowering the price on all courses.
Free LSAT Practice
LSAT Practice Test
LSAT Practice Test Videos
eBook: The Road to 180
Law School Top 100
LSAT Test Proctor
LSAT Logic Games
Apple App Store
Digital LSAT Simulator
Campus Rep Internship
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
LSAT Message Board
December 2004 LSAT
Insufficient rain can cause crops to falter and agricultural prices to rise. Records indicate that during a certain n...
on November 3, 2014
Why is "D" correct?
on November 21, 2014
We are told insufficient rain CAN cause crops to falter and agricultural prices to rise.
So, insufficient rain is one possible explanation for crops faltering and agricultural prices rising.
The argument also the states that during a certain nation's recent crisis, faltering crops and rising agricultural prices have occurred. From this, the argument concludes that the weather, i.e. insufficient rain, must have, therefore, played an important role in bringing about the crisis.
However, we have no evidence for this conclusion. Just because something is a possible cause of an effect, that does not mean that if the effect is present, that a possible cause MUST have played an important role in bringing about the crisis.
Thus, answer choice (D) is the correct answer: "infers, merely from the fact that one event could have caused a second event, that the first event in fact caused the second."
Hope that clears things up! Please let us know if you have any other questions.
Posting to the forum is only allowed for members with active accounts.