I thought "only if" introduces necessary condit...

Why can't Y have Soybeans without X? I thought necessary conditions can still exist without suffi...

Ziena Thursday at 03:40AM

• December 2004 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q20

•

1
Reply

Complete without grouping options?

How would you do this without having the two options drawn out at the bottom?

Zachary on January 24 at 06:56PM

• December 2004 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q20

•

1
Reply

Question 19

Instructor states via deduction that z gets rice. Could you please explain. Thank you

Mark on January 7 at 09:51PM

• December 2004 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q19

•

1
Reply

Contrapositive of rule three (If not Y, then R)

I understand that the contrapositive flips and negates the statement. But the rule states that Ra...

Tucker on November 29 at 09:02PM

• December 2004 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q17

•

1
Reply

answer choice here

answer choice?

on October 5 at 03:06PM

• December 2004 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q3

•

2
Replies

Q5

So for questions on the logical games section that deals with a "must be true" scenario, I find m...

Morgan on June 14 at 05:45PM

• December 2004 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q5

•

1
Reply

Confused

I felt like all of the answer choices could have been true. Could you diagram one or two of them ...

Lizzie on June 3 at 05:48PM

• December 2004 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q9

•

1
Reply

Please explain thanks

Please explain thanks

Amanda on November 13, 2017

• December 2004 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q11

•

1
Reply

Please explain thanks

Please explain thanks

Amanda on November 12, 2017

• December 2004 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q14

•

1
Reply

Please explain - thanks

Please explain - thanks

Amanda on November 12, 2017

• December 2004 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q22

•

1
Reply

Question

How are R and Y in the same photo if R=> not Y?

Danielle on October 10, 2017

• December 2004 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q13

•

3
Replies