-
December 2004 LSAT
- All Exams
- June 2019
- September 2019
- November 2019
- June 2018
- September 2018
- November 2018
- June 2017
- September 2017
- December 2017
- June 2016
- September 2016
- December 2016
- June 2015
- October 2015
- December 2015
- June 2014
- September 2014
- December 2014
- June 2013
- October 2013
- December 2013
- October 2012
- June 2012
- December 2012
- June 2011
- December 2011
- October 2011
- June 2010
- October 2010
- December 2010
- September 2009
- December 2009
- June 2009
- December 2008
- June 2008
- October 2008
- June 2007
- December 2007
- September 2007
- June 2006
- September 2006
- December 2006
- December 2005
- June 2005
- October 2005
- December 2004
- June 2004
- October 2004
- June 2003
- December 2003
- October 2003
- December 2002
- June 2002
- October 2002
- December 2001
- June 2001
- October 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- October 2000
- December 1999
- June 1999
- October 1999
- December 1998
- June 1998
- September 1998
- December 1997
- June 1997
- October 1997
- June 1996
- October 1996
- December 1996
- June 1995
- September 1995
- December 1995
- February 1995
- February 1994
- June 1994
- October 1994
- December 1994
- February 1993
- June 1993
- October 1993
- February 1992
- June 1992
- October 1992
- December 1992
- June 1991
- October 1991
- December 1991
- Section 4
- Recent
Rule 2
Rule 2 states that lulu is in the last game how does it make any sense that lulu is playing again...
on January 8 at 03:45AM
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q10

1
Reply
Reply
Question 1 of 6
when setting up this game, why did you use workout as a variable?
on September 16 at 03:13PM
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q1

1
Reply
Reply
Scenario 2
Scenario Two suggests the following set-up: N/P? TS P/NO LS
Wouldn’t this actually b...
Fiona on August 7 at 11:23PM
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q7

2
Replies
Replies
C
I understand why A must be false, but why is it also not the case that C must be false? If W and ...
on August 1 at 03:33AM
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q17

1
Reply
Reply
Game Setup - How were you able to deduce that t...
How did you figure that the only 2 setups were when 2 Soybeans were either in X and Y or solely i...
on June 26 at 02:40AM
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q18

1
Reply
Reply
Confused on game set-up
I watched the game-set up video, and I am confused why the instructor sets rule 1 as s-->w.
Woul...
Taylor on May 28 at 10:11PM
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q13

2
Replies
Replies

The last rule confusion
I am confused on how to structure the last rule. The rule says “neither ty nor ramundo appear in ...
Michael on May 28 at 06:20PM
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q13

2
Replies
Replies
How do you get to this
I got the first few questions right, but was confused how to get this one
on April 23 at 03:03AM
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q4

3
Replies
Replies
order
how do you know the order without factoring in the workout time
on April 22 at 12:35AM
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q6

1
Reply
Reply
Where's N/P in the first scenario?
In the set-up, how come Nam and Pachai aren't accounted for in the first scenario?
Gabby on March 31 at 04:21AM
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q7

1
Reply
Reply
I thought "only if" introduces necessary condit...
Why can't Y have Soybeans without X? I thought necessary conditions can still exist without suffi...
Ziena on February 27 at 03:40AM
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q20

1
Reply
Reply
Complete without grouping options?
How would you do this without having the two options drawn out at the bottom?
Zachary on January 24, 2020
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q20

1
Reply
Reply
Question 19
Instructor states via deduction that z gets rice. Could you please explain. Thank you
Mark on January 7, 2020
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q19

1
Reply
Reply
Contrapositive of rule three (If not Y, then R)
I understand that the contrapositive flips and negates the statement. But the rule states that Ra...
Tucker on November 29, 2019
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q17

1
Reply
Reply
answer choice here
answer choice?
on October 5, 2019
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q3

2
Replies
Replies
Q5
So for questions on the logical games section that deals with a "must be true" scenario, I find m...
Morgan on June 14, 2019
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q5

1
Reply
Reply
Confused
I felt like all of the answer choices could have been true. Could you diagram one or two of them ...
Lizzie on June 3, 2019
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q9

1
Reply
Reply

Please explain thanks
Please explain thanks
Amanda on November 13, 2017
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q11

1
Reply
Reply

Please explain thanks
Please explain thanks
Amanda on November 12, 2017
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q14

3
Replies
Replies

Please explain - thanks
Please explain - thanks
Amanda on November 12, 2017
- December 2004 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q22

1
Reply
Reply