Home LSAT Prep LSAT Message Board
Game Setup - How were you able to deduce that t...
How did you figure that the only 2 setups were when 2 Soybeans were either in X and Y or solely i...
Jerome on June 26, 2020
  • December 2004 LSAT
  • SEC4
  • Q18
•
1
Reply
Please explain thanks
Please explain thanks
sharpen7 on June 1, 2020
  • December 2004 LSAT
  • SEC4
  • Q14
•
3
Replies
The last rule confusion
I am confused on how to structure the last rule. The rule says “neither ty nor ramundo appear in ...
mikeheath on May 28, 2020
  • December 2004 LSAT
  • SEC4
  • Q13
•
2
Replies
How do you get to this
I got the first few questions right, but was confused how to get this one
iabdullah@elon.edu on May 8, 2020
  • December 2004 LSAT
  • SEC4
  • Q4
•
3
Replies
order
how do you know the order without factoring in the workout time
iabdullah@elon.edu on April 22, 2020
  • December 2004 LSAT
  • SEC4
  • Q6
•
1
Reply
Where's N/P in the first scenario?
In the set-up, how come Nam and Pachai aren't accounted for in the first scenario?
Gabby_teixeira on March 31, 2020
  • December 2004 LSAT
  • SEC4
  • Q7
•
1
Reply
I thought "only if" introduces necessary condit...
Why can't Y have Soybeans without X? I thought necessary conditions can still exist without suffi...
hatemz on February 27, 2020
  • December 2004 LSAT
  • SEC4
  • Q20
•
1
Reply
answer choice here
answer choice?
Lucas on February 20, 2020
  • December 2004 LSAT
  • SEC4
  • Q3
•
2
Replies
Complete without grouping options?
How would you do this without having the two options drawn out at the bottom?
zacdon81 on January 24, 2020
  • December 2004 LSAT
  • SEC4
  • Q20
•
1
Reply
Question 19
Instructor states via deduction that z gets rice. Could you please explain. Thank you
Mark-Livecchi on January 7, 2020
  • December 2004 LSAT
  • SEC4
  • Q19
•
1
Reply
Contrapositive of rule three (If not Y, then R)
I understand that the contrapositive flips and negates the statement. But the rule states that Ra...
Tucker-Sutlive on November 29, 2019
  • December 2004 LSAT
  • SEC4
  • Q17
•
1
Reply
Q5
So for questions on the logical games section that deals with a "must be true" scenario, I find m...
Morgan_Schavone on June 14, 2019
  • December 2004 LSAT
  • SEC4
  • Q5
•
1
Reply
Confused
I felt like all of the answer choices could have been true. Could you diagram one or two of them ...
Lizzie-Annerino on June 3, 2019
  • December 2004 LSAT
  • SEC4
  • Q9
•
1
Reply
Please explain thanks
Please explain thanks
sharpen7 on November 13, 2017
  • December 2004 LSAT
  • SEC4
  • Q11
•
1
Reply
Please explain - thanks
Please explain - thanks
sharpen7 on November 12, 2017
  • December 2004 LSAT
  • SEC4
  • Q22
•
1
Reply