purple and Orange

in Rule 4 it says if a glass does not contain purple glass then it contains orange glass. doesn't...

on August 4 at 01:39PM

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q10

•

1
Reply

Orange & Purple

I'm confused about the orange and purple. I thought they couldn't go together and I still don't u...

Angelica on July 11 at 02:55AM

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q8

•

1
Reply

Why can’t T be in spot 5?

The only Not Law in 5 is P so why can’t G/s/T be in 5? Meaning T wouldn’t have to be in 1

Reina on June 17 at 04:27PM

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q2

•

1
Reply

Game Setup

When I originally attempted this game I made the deduction that G & S will always be in spaces 4,...

Lauren on June 2 at 07:27PM

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q1

•

1
Reply

Question 20

If T in in spot 1 TM block How can 6 be M ? TM or WM rule 3 T M S U R/W...

Scott on May 14 at 05:42PM

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q20

•

2
Replies

The last two constraints

Hey there, I got confused on the last two constraints, in which the video explained that Q & T...

Soroosh on February 16 at 01:59AM

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q14

•

2
Replies

Hypothetical

As you can see, this game tripped me out a but :P. In the hypothetical drawn in the video, the...

Soroosh on February 16 at 01:43AM

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q15

•

4
Replies

Question

I noticed while I was trying to do this game there is hardly any room to diagram the information....

Sierra on January 9 at 02:49AM

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q1

•

1
Reply

Why doesn't answer choice D work? I can't seem ...

I placed Y,P, and R within window 1, G,P,O, and R within window 2, and O and G in window 3

Isaak on December 20 at 06:01PM

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q11

•

6
Replies

Approaching this problem

How is it you can be comfortable with listing out what can and cannot be options for R and checki...

Meredith on October 18, 2019

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q16

•

2
Replies

Question 4 on Game 3

I am not understanding the explanation behind this question, if we are in a 2-2-2-1-1 scenario, t...

Samir on October 8, 2019

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q17

•

1
Reply

Answer

I see how A is correct, but what is the sequence for B being wrong? It doesn't work either.

on December 24, 2018

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q22

•

2
Replies

Confused

Why are we able to use the previous work from question 2 in the other questions if the rule "neit...

Shylah on July 13, 2018

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q2

•

1
Reply

Confused

Hello, How are you coming up with the possiblities in a given set up? For example, "2-2-2-2-...

Shylah on July 8, 2018

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q14

•

1
Reply

Question

I listened the video but still don't understand why the other answers are wrong. It seems as thou...

on June 3, 2018

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q6

•

2
Replies

Help

What about D?

Facundo on December 10, 2015

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q15

•

3
Replies