'S' in 5th

Why is this even a question? am i missing something? S has to come before T and U? why will S app...

Bukola on January 8 at 06:45PM

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q21

•

1
Reply

R with O?

Am I missing something? Why can't O be with R in the last question?

on August 21 at 06:21PM

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q13

•

1
Reply

c & E

Hi that question is tricking because the places are not lined up correctly. C looks like it has 3...

on January 19, 2022

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q14

•

1
Reply

Approaching this problem

How is it you can be comfortable with listing out what can and cannot be options for R and checki...

Meredith on June 4, 2021

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q16

•

3
Replies

Contrapostive of last rule

Still confused on how the contrapostive of this makes sense? "If a window does not contain purpl...

Daniel on January 7, 2021

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q7

•

1
Reply

2-2-2-2-0 & 2-2-2-2-1 ??

Hi, Could you please explain how to come up with the numerical deduction 2-2-2-2-0 and 2-2-2-2...

Rozanna on January 4, 2021

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q15

•

1
Reply

Why doesn't answer choice D work? I can't seem ...

I placed Y,P, and R within window 1, G,P,O, and R within window 2, and O and G in window 3

Isaak on August 5, 2020

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q11

•

6
Replies

purple and Orange

in Rule 4 it says if a glass does not contain purple glass then it contains orange glass. doesn't...

on August 4, 2020

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q10

•

1
Reply

Hypothetical

As you can see, this game tripped me out a but :P. In the hypothetical drawn in the video, the...

Soroosh on July 23, 2020

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q15

•

4
Replies

Orange & Purple

I'm confused about the orange and purple. I thought they couldn't go together and I still don't u...

Angelica on July 11, 2020

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q8

•

1
Reply

Question 20

If T in in spot 1 TM block How can 6 be M ? TM or WM rule 3 T M S U R/W...

Scott on July 8, 2020

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q20

•

2
Replies

Why can’t T be in spot 5?

The only Not Law in 5 is P so why can’t G/s/T be in 5? Meaning T wouldn’t have to be in 1

Reina on June 17, 2020

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q2

•

1
Reply

Question

I listened the video but still don't understand why the other answers are wrong. It seems as thou...

on June 16, 2020

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q6

•

2
Replies

Game Setup

When I originally attempted this game I made the deduction that G & S will always be in spaces 4,...

Lauren on June 2, 2020

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q1

•

1
Reply

The last two constraints

Hey there, I got confused on the last two constraints, in which the video explained that Q & T...

Soroosh on March 11, 2020

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q14

•

2
Replies

Question

I noticed while I was trying to do this game there is hardly any room to diagram the information....

Sierra on January 9, 2020

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q1

•

1
Reply

Question 4 on Game 3

I am not understanding the explanation behind this question, if we are in a 2-2-2-1-1 scenario, t...

Samir on October 8, 2019

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q17

•

1
Reply

Answer

I see how A is correct, but what is the sequence for B being wrong? It doesn't work either.

on December 24, 2018

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q22

•

2
Replies

Confused

Why are we able to use the previous work from question 2 in the other questions if the rule "neit...

Shylah on July 13, 2018

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q2

•

1
Reply

Confused

Hello, How are you coming up with the possiblities in a given set up? For example, "2-2-2-2-...

Shylah on July 8, 2018

• December 2010 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q14

•

1
Reply