Help!!

I have several questions about this game. 1. Why in/out I really can't get how to determine ...

Maria-Marin on August 13, 2021

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q12

•

4
Replies

How is E the right answer?

If L is in 602, wouldn't it force G to be in 601? It's the most restrictive choice that I'm seeing.

Flavio on May 2, 2021

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q5

•

5
Replies

What is this question asking

Is this question asking which pairs could invoke other volunteers to be in? Which pairs invokes ...

RS1 on December 11, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q12

•

2
Replies

Please explain

How would we go about answering this question?

AmarisP on November 13, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q23

•

4
Replies

In / Out Grouping Games

Is there a full list of in / out grouping games similar to this? I definitely need more practice ...

Anna20 on September 3, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q23

•

1
Reply

Why is E wrong?

Why is E wrong in this question?

Vennela-Vellanki on August 19, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q12

•

1
Reply

Answer Choice E

E is the contrapositive of the rule needed to substitute. Why wouldn't it work? The video didn't ...

Partv on July 30, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q23

•

1
Reply

How is A possible?

Answer choice A has M in 604, but M must come before 604. How is this correct?

James-Nash on July 29, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q1

•

4
Replies

WHy can't we say answer choice C is correct?

I understand how answer choice E could work, but answer choice C could also work if F and H are i...

yuetngan on July 27, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q3

•

2
Replies

Difficulty with 2 of 3 P,S,T

Hi There, I've watched this video a number of times and tried drawing out scenarios but they a...

JoshG on May 31, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q18

•

1
Reply

Why do we jump straight to E in the explanation.

Why do we jump straight to E in the answer choice how do we know that S is the issue.

nimakian801 on May 24, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q3

•

1
Reply

Help with translating

I must up the translation of rule 5. If a statement says if t is present then neither f nor v is ...

fable on May 19, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q7

•

5
Replies

Can you explain why C is wrong please?

Can you explain why C is wrong please?

Maria-Marin on April 17, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q20

•

2
Replies

Why in/out

I really can't get how to determine that this was an in/out game. When I did it, I did consider t...

Maria-Marin on April 17, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q7

•

3
Replies

Help!!

I have several questions about this game. 1. Why in/out I really can't get how to determine ...

Maria-Marin on April 17, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q12

•

1
Reply

????

I've watched the game setup. I'm still perplexed as to how you came up with those 3 scenarios. ho...

Maybeillgetlucky on April 6, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q13

•

2
Replies

Question about "or" statements

In this question, I created a chain combining relevant rules: (F or V) -> not T->not M->not R->L....

mahosmar on February 4, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q11

•

1
Reply

How could we figure this out in a timely fashio...

Just out of curiousity...

DrKumar on January 14, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q22

•

3
Replies

Confused about a condition

I am confused about why we conclude something is binary based on the condition if S is out, the V...

manvir on January 12, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q11

•

2
Replies

the wrong answer choices are showing up for the...

the wrong answer choices are showing up for the setup provided

Adam-Estacio on January 12, 2020

• September 2009 LSAT
• SEC4
• Q1

•

1
Reply