-
October 2010 LSAT
- All Exams
- May 2020
- July 2020
- August 2020
- September 2020
- June 2019
- September 2019
- November 2019
- June 2018
- September 2018
- November 2018
- June 2017
- September 2017
- December 2017
- June 2016
- September 2016
- December 2016
- June 2015
- October 2015
- December 2015
- June 2014
- September 2014
- December 2014
- June 2013
- October 2013
- December 2013
- October 2012
- June 2012
- December 2012
- June 2011
- December 2011
- October 2011
- June 2010
- October 2010
- December 2010
- September 2009
- December 2009
- June 2009
- December 2008
- June 2008
- October 2008
- June 2007
- December 2007
- September 2007
- June 2006
- September 2006
- December 2006
- December 2005
- June 2005
- October 2005
- December 2004
- June 2004
- October 2004
- June 2003
- December 2003
- October 2003
- December 2002
- June 2002
- October 2002
- December 2001
- June 2001
- October 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- October 2000
- December 1999
- June 1999
- October 1999
- December 1998
- June 1998
- September 1998
- December 1997
- June 1997
- October 1997
- June 1996
- October 1996
- December 1996
- June 1995
- September 1995
- December 1995
- February 1995
- February 1994
- June 1994
- October 1994
- December 1994
- February 1993
- June 1993
- October 1993
- June 1992
- October 1992
- December 1992
- February 1992
- June 1991
- October 1991
- December 1991
- Mini Practice
- Section 4
- Recent
Isn't rule 4 invalid?
3. If not U then R2
4. R2 then not U. That's just reversing which is invalid, right? Will that...
JosephB on March 12 at 02:46AM
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q12
1
Reply
Reply
Two Answers Seem to be Correct
Two of these answers seem to be correct- R is in 4th place and S does not run.
izyat on January 15 at 02:53AM
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q16
1
Reply
Reply
Why isn't C correct?
But wouldn't C also be true because it would be impossible for S to be right before T because Q h...
izyat on January 15 at 02:48AM
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q15
1
Reply
Reply
Combining rules 3 and 4
Hello,
Can you help me understand how rules 3 and 4 are combined?
3. No U-> R2
No R2 -...
mmohammed01 on January 15 at 02:47AM
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q12
1
Reply
Reply
Why not 3 possibilities for spot 2?
Why couldn't G also be in second?
izyat on January 15 at 02:45AM
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q10
1
Reply
Reply
How to handle rule 3 with up front work
Instead of doing one master digram, once I got to p>h+n or h+n>p, I made two separate webs / maps...
amoli078@fiu.edu on September 15, 2023
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q6
1
Reply
Reply
Tip
any tips for how to pick up that T must be in? I missed this inference and it threw off a lot of ...
amoli078@fiu.edu on September 7, 2023
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q12
1
Reply
Reply
Why are we assuming that G is always with Lisa
The video explanation for question 3 states that since "G is always with Lisa," but L is the nece...
Jean on April 14, 2023
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q3
2
Replies
Replies
approach
For cannot be true question do we just try out the answer choices?
Ryn on January 16, 2022
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q15
1
Reply
Reply
Video Explanation
Hello, there is still no video explanation for the game setup and question explanation.
tomgbean on October 6, 2021
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q18
4
Replies
Replies
Video
Please add a video explanation, I noticed this was asked from two years ago already.
fable on October 6, 2021
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q18
3
Replies
Replies
how did you figure this out?
could you walk me through how you got the answer? I got it right but it took forever. is there an...
Remi on February 11, 2021
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q21
2
Replies
Replies
Video
Hello, I was just wondering where the video explanation is for game 7. I just want to better unde...
missyargaw14 on November 5, 2020
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q11
4
Replies
Replies
M 1st
What is wrong with this setup?
MJLFGKH? It violates no rules. L is capable of being in third a...
tomgbean on October 28, 2020
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q20
4
Replies
Replies
Could you please explain
Could you please explain the question set up and answers since this is on a diagnostic exam?
Advaith on August 27, 2020
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q18
8
Replies
Replies
how were you able to deduct that T must be in f...
how were you able to deduct that T must be in from the first rule - I do not understand how you m...
Skyler-Simon on July 31, 2020
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q13
4
Replies
Replies
Game SetUp
The Game setup doesn't work.
tomgbean on November 6, 2019
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q13
1
Reply
Reply
Game Setup
All the question explanation will play, but the game set up will not load. Please help
Remington-Dean on October 31, 2019
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q12
2
Replies
Replies
How did you get c?
How did you eliminate the other answer choices?
ethilavanh on September 4, 2019
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q19
1
Reply
Reply
Clearification please
Hello. Can you please walk me through this question?
Thank you.
LizD on June 17, 2019
- October 2010 LSAT
- SEC4
- Q22
4
Replies
Replies