-
October 1997 LSAT
- All Exams
- May 2020
- July 2020
- August 2020
- June 2019
- September 2019
- November 2019
- June 2018
- September 2018
- November 2018
- June 2017
- September 2017
- December 2017
- June 2016
- September 2016
- December 2016
- June 2015
- October 2015
- December 2015
- June 2014
- September 2014
- December 2014
- June 2013
- October 2013
- December 2013
- October 2012
- June 2012
- December 2012
- June 2011
- December 2011
- October 2011
- June 2010
- October 2010
- December 2010
- September 2009
- December 2009
- June 2009
- December 2008
- June 2008
- October 2008
- June 2007
- December 2007
- September 2007
- June 2006
- September 2006
- December 2006
- December 2005
- June 2005
- October 2005
- December 2004
- June 2004
- October 2004
- June 2003
- December 2003
- October 2003
- December 2002
- June 2002
- October 2002
- December 2001
- June 2001
- October 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- October 2000
- December 1999
- June 1999
- October 1999
- December 1998
- June 1998
- September 1998
- December 1997
- June 1997
- October 1997
- June 1996
- October 1996
- December 1996
- June 1995
- September 1995
- December 1995
- February 1995
- February 1994
- June 1994
- October 1994
- December 1994
- February 1993
- June 1993
- October 1993
- June 1992
- October 1992
- December 1992
- February 1992
- June 1991
- October 1991
- December 1991
- Mini Practice
- Section 3
- Recent

These kinds of passages tends to be the most bo...
Not getting the stimulus one bit. Makes 0 sense to me.
on December 26 at 05:54PM
- October 1997 LSAT
- SEC3
- Q19

1
Reply
Reply
Stimulus Typo
The stimulus states "1942", not 1492. I would have used my common sense on this but was told to t...
on June 2, 2022
- October 1997 LSAT
- SEC3
- Q19

1
Reply
Reply
Why not D
I can understand the correct answer, but why does d not follow the same pattern. The review says ...
Kyland on January 23, 2022
- October 1997 LSAT
- SEC3
- Q23

1
Reply
Reply

Justify the intended outcome
I can see that the conclusion here is that "nothing will justify a means except an end’s value." ...
on March 30, 2021
- October 1997 LSAT
- SEC3
- Q25

1
Reply
Reply
Why is the answer E and not B?
Wouldn't E weaken the argument, because if people drove when it is more feasible to walk, then po...
Shri on September 24, 2020
- October 1997 LSAT
- SEC3
- Q9

1
Reply
Reply
Why is the answer not C?
Why is the answer not C? Thanks
jing jing on May 21, 2020
- October 1997 LSAT
- SEC3
- Q20

1
Reply
Reply
Main point
How would you determine main point? I originally chose A.
Audrey on August 13, 2019
- October 1997 LSAT
- SEC3
- Q21

1
Reply
Reply
Can this be explained? I am having trouble seei...
The other answers do not make sense, yet I am having trouble understanding how B has anything to ...
Dany on July 22, 2019
- October 1997 LSAT
- SEC3
- Q10

3
Replies
Replies
Additional Question
I picked (A) over (E) after pondering over choosing between both. But, I still don't understand w...
Sangwook on September 26, 2014
- October 1997 LSAT
- SEC3
- Q22

2
Replies
Replies
Help
I can't clearly understand the weakness of Helen's justification and why (E) is the answer for th...
Sangwook on September 18, 2014
- October 1997 LSAT
- SEC3
- Q22

1
Reply
Reply