Daily Drills 1 - Section 1 - Question 4

Supply the missing premise that makes the conclusion follow logically: P: D–most–BP: ?C:B–some–C

Kelley October 22, 2019

Question 4

I don't get this question either. Can anyone please explain?

Replies
Create a free account to read and take part in forum discussions.

Already have an account? log in

BenMingov October 22, 2019

Hi Kelley, thanks for the question!

If we have the premise D-most-B and the conclusion B-some-C, then we need to find a premise that would allow us to somehow connect B and C. The common denominator through which we can connect them is D.

If D - > C, then we have the following diagram:

C < - D-most-B

If D-most-B, we know that B-some-D

Now let's connect B-some-D - > C, which gives us the inference of B-some-C.

Hope this helps!

Kelley October 22, 2019

What does the 'some' and 'most' in between 'D', 'B' and 'C' means?

May 16, 2020

You should explain how to combine some, most, and all statements

Skylar June 28, 2020

@Kelley, happy to help!

Quantifier statements (some/most statements) and how to combine them are covered in depth in the "Quantifiers" lesson. If you have not gotten to that section in your study plan yet, don't worry. I would recommend returning to this drill after you make your way through that lesson.

Does that make sense? Hope it helps! Please let us know if you have any other questions!