This is not an error, D truly is the correct answer. I see why A was tempting, but let's compare the two options.
Answer choice A suggests that prosecutors are judged based on their quantity of good cases. If computer-fraud cases take much more time than the average fraud case, it is in the interest of these prosecutors to avoid spending time on them. Maybe they could get two or three convictions in the time it takes to make a computer crime conviction. It makes sense that they would seek cases that are quicker and easier. This could be a reason why computer criminals are unlikely to be convicted, which supports the claim.
D is the correct answer, because there is a difference between conviction and sentencing. We do not know how the overcrowding of prisons affects conviction rates. This answer choice does not support the claim above.
eli918July 17, 2020
Just as a clarification, answer choice A stated the number of GOOD cases made.... Which I thought indicated the quality of cases not the over all quantity... am I wrong?
