Free LSAT Practice
LSAT Practice Test
LSAT Practice Test Videos
eBook: The Road to 180
Law School Top 100
LSAT Test Proctor
LSAT Logic Games
Apple App Store
Digital LSAT Simulator
Campus Rep Internship
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
LSAT Message Board
December 2007 LSAT
Lawyer: A body of circumstantial evidence is like a rope, and each item of evidence is like a strand of that rope. J...
on September 10, 2017
I don't understand why A is correct?
on September 12, 2017
@JayDee8732 the problem with this analogy is every strand of rope has the same importance.
This is obviously not the case with circumstantial evidence, i.e. some pieces of evidence are more critical than others.
As such, if a really important piece of evidence is discredited, it would not be true that the overall body of evidence retains its basic strength.
This is why (A) is the correct answer, i.e. "takes for granted that no items in a body of circumstantial evidence are significantly more critical to the strength of the evidence than other items in that body."
Hope that helps! Please let us know if you have any other questions.
Posting to the forum is only allowed for members with active accounts.