so, I am following along with the pattern and understanding the rules.. the problem I am having with understanding this example is with Rule #2 how you need to have S in common...well in this example yes, corrupt local governments are in all three, but only in one example is it in the sufficient spot, the other two are in the necessary spot..so how does it fulfill rule #2?
Reply
Create a free account to read and
take part in forum discussions.
I am not quite sure I am understanding your question here, so please let me know if I have misunderstood.
Quantifiers are NOT Sufficient & Necessary so the left side of a quantifier statement is NOT a necessary condition.
What these two quantifiers have in common with your Sufficient & Necessary statement here is CNG and CNG is the sufficient condition, i.e. CNG ==> WLG.
So this means we can combine as follows:
SPP-most-CNG ==> WLG
To conclude:
SPP-most-WLG
WLG-some-SPP
AND . . .
PP-some-CNG ==> WLG
To conclude:
PP-some-WLG
WLG-some-PP
Hope that helps! Please let us know if you have any other questions.
