Free LSAT Practice
LSAT Practice Test
LSAT Practice Test Videos
eBook: The Road to 180
Law School Top 100
LSAT Test Proctor
LSAT Logic Games
Apple App Store
Digital LSAT Simulator
Campus Rep Internship
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
LSAT Message Board
September 2009 LSAT
Nutritionists believe that a person's daily requirement for vitamins can readily be met by eating five servings of fr...
on February 12, 2018
Can you please explain this question?
on February 14, 2018
@rdolm of course! Let's break down the stimulus first.
What is the conclusion here? "Thus, most people need to take vitamin pills."
How do we know this?
"Nutritionists believe that a person's daily requirement for vitamins can readily be met by eating five servings of fruits and vegetables daily. However, most people eat far less than this."
This is a flawed argument. Why? It assumes that the only way to get your daily requirement for vitamins is by eating five servings of fruits and vegetables daily. Since most people eat far less than this, the author assumes that most people need to take vitamin pills.
But what if most people got their daily requirement for vitamins from sources other than servings of fruits and vegetables? Other foods for example.
This is exactly what (D) says, "Many commonly consumed foods that are neither fruits nor vegetables are fortified by manufacturers with the vitamins found in fruits and vegetables."
Therefore, (D) weakens this argument by pointing out an alternative source of vitamins.
So (D) would be the correct answer. Hope that helps!
Posting to the forum is only allowed for members with active accounts.