Based on the passage, it can be concluded that the author and Broyles-González hold essentially the same attitude toward
on March 22, 2018
Argument Completion Cards Confusing Question
Hi,
For the argument completion drill:
P: C--->Not D
P: ?
C: not D-some-X
I first translated the conclusion to X--->Not D
So we have C---->Not D and to get to the conclusion, I would think we'd need X---->C
So that would be X--->C--->not D so by the transitive property, X---->Not D
Why is the answer C----->X?
Thank You
2 Replies
Mehranon March 23, 2018
You cannot transform not D-some-X to X ==> not D.
This is incorrect.
Please rewatch our video lesson on Quantifiers to ensure that you are following the correct rules.
Anneton January 23, 2020
Can someone please fully explain this problem. Because I originally put down the answer for the missing premise as C-some-X
