Based on the passage, it can be concluded that the author and Broyles-González hold essentially the same attitude toward
on March 22, 2018
Argument Completion Cards Confusing Question
Hi,
For the argument completion drill:
P: C--->Not D
P: ?
C: not D-some-X
I first translated the conclusion to X--->Not D
So we have C---->Not D and to get to the conclusion, I would think we'd need X---->C
So that would be X--->C--->not D so by the transitive property, X---->Not D
Why is the answer C----->X?
Thank You
2 Replies
Mehranon March 23, 2018
You cannot transform not D-some-X to X ==> not D.
This is incorrect.
Please rewatch our video lesson on Quantifiers to ensure that you are following the correct rules.
AnnetThursday at 06:12PM
Can someone please fully explain this problem. Because I originally put down the answer for the missing premise as C-some-X
