September 2014 LSAT Section 2 Question 12
Anita on April 26, 2018D is different from A in that D says the decision would have been justified if the commission members would have agreed IF they had been consulted - however, this leaves open room for the chair not to ask if he already thinks/knows that they would have agreed. It also clarifies that it has to be each member.
Rachel on April 27, 2018Hmm I'm still not quite getting it. I think I'm confused cause D implies all of the members consent are given and A just says most?
Anita on May 1, 2018Yes, D says all of them WOULD consent IF asked, not that they must be. This means that they don't necessarily have to give consent, either - just that they would have if they had been asked.
Molly on September 4, 2018Hi,
Max on September 5, 2018@mj-thoms this is a sufficient assumption question. In other words, we are looking for a premise that IF TRUE, makes the conclusion valid.
on October 11, 2019I'm sorry, I'm really lost. That explanation didn't make sense to me.