October 2010 LSAT Section 1 Question 1
Zachary on April 27, 2018
Actually I think where the answer lies is exactly in that question: is it the advertisement or the taxes? It's not the taxes and, here, let me tell you why: it's because the stores responded by countering the taxes so it's not that explication, it must be the advertisement. Which therefore strengthens the conclusion.Zachary on April 27, 2018
Explanation*Anita on April 29, 2018
That's correct! If we're looking to say it's the advertising campaign, then it would help to say it wasn't the taxes. We can tell it isn't the taxes because those were counterbalanced by the price drop.