June 2010 LSAT
Section 5
Question 18
Based on the passage, it can be concluded that the author and Broyles-González hold essentially the same attitude toward
Replies
Deke on June 9, 2018
(And then NOT swappable with some when reversing)Christopher on June 10, 2018
@Deke, I do think you may be overthinking it a bit.Let's take the glasses concept by say there are 100 glasses by xyz. We know nothing about the 100 glasses except that there are 100. If we measure 4, and they are all 4mm thick, then we can say "some are 4mm." If we measure 51, and they are all 4mm this, then we can say "most are 4mm." It is possible that ALL of the 100 glasses are 4mm thick, but we cannot know that from the information we have.
Similarly, if we measure 4 glasses which are not 4mm thick, we can conclude that "some are not 4mm." If we measure 51 that are not 4mm thick, we can say "most are not 4mm." Again, it is possible that ALL are not 4mm, but we cannot know that with the given information.
However, if we KNOW that NONE of the 100 glasses are 4mm thick, then it no longer becomes an issue of some/most but an issue of all/none. So rather than "xyz glasses - some/most - not 4mm" it would be "xyz glasses ==> not 4mm."
Does that make sense?
Deke on June 10, 2018
Yes, thank you, i read that for the test it is best to fold my idea of "not all" back into "some/most are not", which of course still allows for zero in the same manner as some/most allows for 100%.