Get up to 15 hours of free tutoring worth $3000 with an
Invite a Friend
Free LSAT Practice
LSAT Practice Test
LSAT Practice Test Videos
eBook: The Road to 180
Law School Top 100
LSAT Test Proctor
LSAT Logic Games
Apple App Store
Digital LSAT Simulator
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
LSAT Message Board
June 2017 LSAT
Even though she thought the informant was untrustworthy, the journalist promised not to reveal his identity so long a...
on August 24, 2018
Please explain the thought process here.
on August 25, 2018
@EmilyMarieMenendez Here, the prompt is telling us there are a couple ways the journalist could reveal the informantâ€™s identity:
A) If the information is incorrect or
B) If ordered to do so by a judge or her editor
The conclusion is that the information is correct, but she will still have to reveal the identity. That leaves open only the option that she will be ordered to do so by a judge or her editor.
Weâ€™re looking for an answer that would fill in why it is that she could be forced to do so. C tells us that since the information concerns safety, a judge will order her to reveal the informant. That fixes the gap.
Posting to the forum is only allowed for members with active accounts.
REFER A FRIEND