LSATMax and COVID-19:
Amid these difficult times, we're lowering the price on all courses.
Free LSAT Practice
LSAT Practice Test
LSAT Practice Test Videos
eBook: The Road to 180
Law School Top 100
LSAT Test Proctor
LSAT Logic Games
Apple App Store
Digital LSAT Simulator
Campus Rep Internship
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
LSAT Message Board
October 2010 LSAT
Economist: Countries with an uneducated population are destined to be weak economically and politically, whereas tho...
on October 30, 2018
Could you please diagram this question please?
on October 31, 2018
Hi @DanielDePasquale, thanks for your post. Yes, let's diagram the stimulus piece by piece.
Premise: Countries with an uneducated population ("CUP") are destined to be weak economically and politically ("WEP").
CUP - > WEP
Premise: Whereas those with an educated population ("CEP") have governments that display a serious financial commitment to public education ("CPE").
CEP - > CPE
So any nation with a government that has made such a commitment (i.e., to public education, so again: "CPE") will avoid economic and political weakness ("not WEP").
CPE - > not WEP
This is a flawed method of reasoning, because as you'll notice the necessary condition set out in the second premise becomes, without justification, the sufficient condition for the conclusion.
Answer choice (B) is flawed in the same way. Let's diagram that, too:
Premise: People incapable of empathy ("IE") are not good candidates for public office ("not GCPO").
IE - > not GCPO
Premise: Those who do have the capacity for empathy ("CE") are able to manipulate others easily ("AMO")
CE - > AMO
Hence, people who can manipulate others are good candidates for public office ("GCPO").
AMO - > GCPO
Hope this helps! Please let us know if you have any additional questions.
Posting to the forum is only allowed for members with active accounts.