LSATMax and COVID-19:
Amid these difficult times, we're lowering the price on all courses.
Free LSAT Practice
LSAT Practice Test
LSAT Practice Test Videos
eBook: The Road to 180
Law School Top 100
LSAT Test Proctor
LSAT Logic Games
Apple App Store
Digital LSAT Simulator
Campus Rep Internship
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
LSAT Message Board
December 2003 LSAT
Commentator: In many countries the influence of fringe movements is increasing. The great centrifugal engine of mode...
on April 9, 2019
Can i get some clarification between B and D?
on May 13, 2019
We are looking for an answer choice that weakens the commentator's argument.
B is the correct answer in this case as it contradicts the commentator's conclusion that national identities are threatened by modern culture. If a stable national identity is typically a composite of a large number of subcultures, then modern culture would support rather than threaten national identities.
B and D are similar in that they both discuss the concept of pluralistic cultures; however, D takes a stance, claiming that pluralistic national cultures are preferable to monolithic national cultures. In the passage, the commentator is simply claiming that modern culture threatens current national identities. They do not take a stance on this supposed replacement of monolithic national cultures with pluralistic national cultures. They are simply stating the conclusion that they have reached based on the evidence that modern culture is quickly producing new ideologies etc., and that these fringe movements are becoming more influential.
It is also significant to note that my explanation of D above conflates "national culture" and "national identity." It is unclear whether the commentator believes that the two are one and the same or not.
Hope this is helpful! Let us know if you have any further questions.
Posting to the forum is only allowed for members with active accounts.