(E) says, "All substances except those that do not occur naturally in any source are considered natural."
(E) is basically exactly what Sabina is assuming in her argument. With (E), we're identifying a missing assumption because she didn't say this in her argument. Sabina assumes that if a chemical exists anywhere in nature (just as alphahydroxy acids are found in sugarcane), then it can be considered to be natural, even if the case involves that chemical being made a manufacturing plant. This is a big assumption she's making. If (E) is true, it would certainly strengthen her argument by confirming the assumption she is making.
In identifying this missing assumption, we are strengthening her argument, so (E) is the correct answer choice.
Hope this helps. Let us know if you have any other questions!