Julie on July 29 at 02:52PM
Hi LSAT Max,
Would love to see if I went about this question the right way:
So the main takeaway from the stimulus is that the conclusion states refurbishing the factory is the ONLY way to survive in today's market, but we see in the premise that the outdated and inefficient equipment is only ONE REASON that the parts are expensive.
(A) talks about the price changing over time, but our concern is the jump from one reason to the only solution
(D) technically is wrong because the outdated and inefficient equipment is one cause that the manager claims? (I wasn't too sure if that was the right reason to eliminate)
(E), might be effective doesn't fit because the conclusion states that there's only one solution? (another answer choice I wasn't 100% satisfied with my explanation for eliminating)
Many thanks in advance!
Shunhe on January 1 at 08:35PM