Insurers and doctors are well aware that the incidence of lower-back injuries among office workers who spend long hou...

on August 16 at 10:24PM

Option E

I don’t understand how E has anything to do with the furniture design not promoting workers’ health?

4 Replies

Irina on August 17 at 12:24AM

@Minerva,

The argument tells us that the incidence of lower-back injuries is higher among office workers than that among people who regularly do physical work. It then uses this evidence to conclude that office equipment and furniture are not properly designed to promote workers' health. Which of the following most undermines the reasoning above?

A correct answer to this weaken question will likely provide an alternative explanation to these facts. (E) tells us that consistent physical exercise is the most effective way to prevent and recover from lower-back injuries, meaning people who regularly do physical work, i.e. exercise consistently, are less likely to suffer from low-back injuries, whereas office workers who spend most of the time sitting fail to strengthen their lower back via exercise and thus more likely to have higher incidence of back injuries. This alternative - and more plausible - explanation undermines the argument's conclusion that the discrepancy between two groups is due to the furniture design.

Does this make sense?

Let me know if you have any further questions.

on August 17 at 01:24AM

Makes perfect sense now, thanks @Irina!

Ravi on August 17 at 08:41PM

@Minverva, let us know if you have any other questions!

Ravi on August 17 at 08:41PM

@Minerva* (there was a typo in my first message)