Good Morning, the explanation in purple seems to violate the [~VT/~TV} rule. I count:
W < r/s < r/s < Y < T/v < Q < T/V
W < R < S < Y < T < Q < V
W < S < R < Y < T < Q < V
W < R < S < Y < V < Q < T
W < R < S < Y < T < Q < V.
I appreciate your time and attention.
Replies
Create a free account to read and
take part in forum discussions.
I agree with Frederick's assessment.. Could someone illuminate?
SkylarSeptember 28, 2019
@DEFCONFMB Maybe I can help. Let's take a look.
The purple explanation does not violate the last rule becuase it does not place T and V next to each other. Rather, it places them in spots 5 and 7, separated by Q in spot 6.
Otherwise, your set-up of "W - R/S - S/R - Y - T/V - Q - V/T" is correct. This gives us four possible scenarios (which is why answer choice A is correct). Your first three listed scenarios are correct, but your fourth scenario is a replica of your first. Rather, it should be "W-S-R-Y-V-Q-T."
Does this make sense? Please let us know if you have any other questions!
SkylarSeptember 28, 2019
@LSATChris Please see the updated message board explanation and let us know if this helps to clarify.
