October 2010 LSAT Section 1 Question 13
Skylar on September 8, 2019@Adri I assume you're asking about #5? You've done a good job at identiying the confusing part of this question- which is what makes it a paradox. The paradox is this: Although smoking has decreased, home fires (which are usually caused by smoking in bed) have not. This doesn't make sense, so normally we would need to look for an answer choice that provides additoinal information to connect the two pieces. However, because this is a Paradox Bizarro question, we are looking for the one answer choice that does NOT resolve the paradox by providing a possible explanation.