Henry: Engines powered by electricity from batteries cause less pollution than internal combustion engines. Therefore...

Lauren on September 27 at 07:23PM

Why A?

Can someone please explain why A is the correct answer? I’m a little confused as to why the pollution being kept in small areas is sufficient to weaken the second argument? I didn’t really see how it address the issue of power plants causing pollution. @lsatmax

2 Replies

Irina on September 27 at 08:17PM

@Lauren-Au,

Let's look at the arguments each of the speakers is making.
Henry argues that battery-powered (electric vehicles) cause less pollution, therefore to reduce urban pollution we should switch to electric vehicles.
Umit disagrees saying that electric vehicles need to be recharged often, creating greater demand for electricity, thus more electricity will need to be generated by power plants resulting in more pollution.

What is the best counter to Umit?

There are a couple we can think of off the bet, perhaps the electric generation mix in the area is mostly clean energy - wind and solar, thus there is no additional pollution. Perhaps, the incremental demand for electricity is associated with less pollution compared to the amount of pollution from driving regular cars.

The correct answer choice (A) points out that pollution caused by power plants is usually confined to a small number locations a significant distance from major cities, meaning that any incremental energy demand for EVs will result in more pollution in these remote locations where the power plants are sited and will actually reduce the urban pollution in major cities. Since the argument concerns only URBAN pollution, the fact that incremental pollution will be in other than URBAN areas weakens Umit's argument.

Let me know if this helps and if you have any further questions.

Lauren on October 15 at 05:01PM

@Irina could you also explain then why (B) and (E) are also wrong because I'm having difficulty understanding how we can eliminate these.