LSATMax and COVID-19:
Amid these difficult times, we're lowering the price on all courses.
Free LSAT Practice
LSAT Practice Test
LSAT Practice Test Videos
eBook: The Road to 180
Law School Top 100
LSAT Test Proctor
LSAT Logic Games
Apple App Store
Digital LSAT Simulator
Campus Rep Internship
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
LSAT Message Board
December 2013 LSAT
Zoologist: In the Lake Champlain area, as the North American snowshoe hare population grows, so do the populations of...
on October 10 at 03:37PM
Why is B correct? Why is E incorrect?
on October 23 at 05:31PM
The Zoologist's argument starts off explaining the cycle that occurs between hares and predators in the Lake Champlain area. The last two sentences take a bit of a diversion though and connect this idea to sunspot activity.
Therefore, answers which will support this argument are going to connect sunspot activity and the predator-hare cycle. However, this question is set up for you to look for the answer that doesn't support the argument. So you'll want to eliminate the answers that connect sunspots and the predator-hare cycle.
(A) is incorrect. This answer states that sun spots have an affect on predator populations. This has a direct effect on the cycle of predator and hare populations.
(B) is correct. This answer states that weather patterns have an affect both with and without sunspots. Thus, it's saying sunspots don't really have an effect. You're looking for an answer which does NOT connect sunspots to the hare-predator cycle, and this one works.
(E) is incorrect. The nutritional value of food can have an effect on whether a population lives long and healthy lives. If more hares are eating good nutrition, they're likely to live longer, and this will change the predator-hare cycle. Thus, this answer choice demonstrates sunspots having an affect on the cycle.
Posting to the forum is only allowed for members with active accounts.