LSATMax and COVID-19:
Amid these difficult times, we're lowering the price on all courses.
Free LSAT Practice
LSAT Practice Test
LSAT Practice Test Videos
eBook: The Road to 180
Law School Top 100
LSAT Test Proctor
LSAT Logic Games
Apple App Store
Digital LSAT Simulator
Campus Rep Internship
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
LSAT Message Board
December 2014 LSAT
Student: If a person has an immunity to infection by a microorganism, then that microorganism does not cause them to ...
on October 18 at 01:59PM
Why is D correct? Why is B incorrect?
on October 18 at 05:02PM
The argument tells us that if A then B, thus if B is true, then A must be true.
If a person has immunity (A), then they develop no symptoms (B).
People exposed to staphylococcus develop no symptoms (B).
Therefore, they must have immunity (A).
This is a logical fallacy of affirming the consequent/ mistaken reversal. Let's compare it to options (B) and (D)
Advertisers (A) try to persuade people that certain claims are true (B).
Writers of fiction are not advertisers (~A).
Therefore, they never try to persuade people (~B).
If A then B
This is also an invalid argument, but the type of logical fallacy is different from the stimulus.
When business owners are subjected to taxation (A), they become less willing to expand their business (B).
Business expansions are in decline (B)
Therefore, taxes are too high (A)
If A then B
This flawed reasoning pattern is identical to the stimulus and is, therefore, the correct answer.
Posting to the forum is only allowed for members with active accounts.