Editorial: The town would not need to spend as much as it does on removing trash if all town residents sorted their h...

Meredith Saturday at 10:10PM

B v D

Why B over D? I didn’t chose B because I felt that phrase really didn’t help the alt. Option to the authors proposal (too strong of a claim when I felt the phrase simply laid the background / foundation to the argument

1 Reply

Irina Sunday at 04:35AM

@Meredith,

The issue with (D) is that the argument does not actually rely on this premise to reach the conclusion as you pointed out - this fact is not particularly helpful, whereas the premise an argument relies on must have an impact on the validity of the conclusion. The conclusion is based on the following premises:

Because many residents would resent a mandate to sort their garbage despite some compliance
Because the costs are the same for either system
Because voluntary system does not endanger as much resentment

Therefore, voluntary system is preferred.

(B) is correct because this fact lends some - though weak - support to an alternative to a practice that the editorial defends as preferable. The editorial defends voluntary system for garbage sorting, hence the alternative to it is a mandatory system. The fact that universal compliance would save the town money on removing trash supports the fact that a mandatory system should be implemented.

Let me know if this makes sense and if you have any other questions.