on November 19 at 04:42AM
I am currently practicing what we just went over in this lesson (the part right before the example questions start) and I am a little confused on the conclusion for example #2. It goes :
P: T most S
P: T -> R
Both rule #1 and rule #2 are satisfied therefore a conclusion is possible. While the right conclusion to draw is: S-s-R, I am wondering how this other conclusion is not correct. C: R most S, I know it does not follow the rules we went over but it makes sense looking at the diagram.
S S S S S S
T T T T T
R R R R R
If most Ts are S and all Ts are R then accordingly most Rs are S (R m S), no?
on November 19 at 04:46AM
Irina on November 19 at 05:28PM