LSATMax and COVID-19:
Amid these difficult times, we're lowering the price on all courses.
Free LSAT Practice
LSAT Practice Test
LSAT Practice Test Videos
eBook: The Road to 180
Law School Top 100
LSAT Test Proctor
LSAT Logic Games
Apple App Store
Digital LSAT Simulator
Campus Rep Internship
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
LSAT Message Board
December 2009 LSAT
At one sitting, a typical doughnut eater consumes 4 doughnuts containing a total of 680 calories and 40 grams of fat....
on November 30 at 12:32PM
Can you explain this?
Can you explain this one?
on November 30 at 05:22PM
This is a necessary assumption question, so we are looking for an answer choice that would render the argument invalid if untrue/ when negated. Let's look at the argument.
The argument tells us that a typical doughnut eater consumers a total of 680 calories and 40 grams of fat in one sitting, and a typical bagel eater consumes 500 calories and two grams of fat though the addition of spreads can approximate the calorie & fat content of the four-donut range.
The argument then concludes that as far as total calorie content is concerned, there is little difference between a typical doughnut eater and a typical bagel eater.
Let's look at the answer choices:
(A) The calories in bagels have the same health impact..
Incorrect. The argument is not concerned with the health impact, only the calorie content.
(B) Most bagel eaters are not fully aware of the calorie and fat content of a bagel..
Incorrect. It is irrelevant whether one is aware of the calorie content or not.
(C) Eating bagels instead of eating donuts provides no real health benefit
Incorrect. The argument is not concerned with health benefits, only the total calorie content.
(D) The typical doughnut eater does not add to doughnuts any substances that increase the caloric intake.
Correct. The argument presumes that:
bagel + toppings = 4 donuts
but if a doughnut eater also adds spreads and toppings that increase the caloric intake, then we could conclude that:
bagel + toppings < 4 donuts in terms of calories, which invalidates the argument's conclusion.
Therefore, we must assume that the typical doughnut eater does not any substances that would increase the caloric intake.
(E) Most typical doughnut eaters are not also bagel eater.
Incorrect. The argument compares the calorie intake per one sitting not overall, so even if the groups overlap, there is no impact on the validity of the conclusion.
Let me know if this makes sense and if you have any further questions.
Posting to the forum is only allowed for members with active accounts.